test(e2e): Port nextjs-16-userfeedback to span streaming - #23867
Merged
chargome merged 1 commit intoSep 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
size-limit report 📦
|
Removes the `traceLifecycle: 'static'` pins. The specs assert on feedback and error envelopes via `waitForEnvelopeItem`, which span streaming does not change, so no spec rewrite is needed. Ref #23802 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
chargome
force-pushed
the
test/e2e-port-nextjs-16-userfeedback
branch
from
September 2, 2026 10:58
850a896 to
22d729f
Compare
chargome
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 2, 2026 12:51
JPeer264
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes the
traceLifecycle: 'static'pins fromnextjs-16-userfeedback. Its specs assert on feedback and error envelopes, which streaming does not change, so no spec rewrite is needed.Ref #23802