Skip to content

State header-encryption splice resistance as a sender guarantee - #150

Merged
germ-mark merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
llm/book-splice-resistance
Sep 24, 2026
Merged

germ-mark merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
llm/book-splice-resistance

Conversation

@germ-mark

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The header-encryption chapter contradicted itself. The design-rationale and "does provide" sections claimed whole-frame splice resistance because the outer AEAD covers a frame as one unit. The receive rule, though, accepts an already-opened frame as a convenience and calls metadata hiding a sender guarantee.

This PR reconciles them in spec text, with no behavior change. Splice resistance against network adversaries holds because every outbound frame is sealed, so an adversary without the header keys never sees a frame's sections to recombine. It's a sender guarantee that receivers don't enforce, and it doesn't extend to anyone holding opened frames or the keys. Peer-level mix-and-match hardening (checking the AD on receive) remains separate.

Book-only, with an empty changeset. mdbook build passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Receivers accept already-opened frames, so the property follows from
sealing every outbound frame, not from receive-side enforcement.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 22dcc6f

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@germ-mark
germ-mark merged commit 339add9 into main Sep 24, 2026
11 checks passed
@germ-mark
germ-mark deleted the llm/book-splice-resistance branch September 24, 2026 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant