[pie575]

These 14 comparisons now lead with the GT advantage that fits the reader: keeping existing catalogs, writing copy inline with code context, or generating translations as part of a release. The revisions preserve the original recommendations and outcome headings, remove duplicated pricing pitches and product-deficit detours, and correct the examples that support those recommendations.

Stacked directly on #648 (kb/gt-vs-leaderboard-tools). Review this incremental diff; each article has its own commit with a specific justification.

Article	Change and reason
django-i18n	Keep Django extraction and rendering; explain GT plural generation, shared context, review, and the three CI stages. Import existing work before generation.
flask-babel	Keep the reader’s Flask-Babel calls and formatting. Focus the comparison on PO generation, context, plural forms, and review instead of an unrelated Python-library detour.
gettext	Retain the fuzzy-entry example and show how GT regenerates changed copy. Explain PO context, review, and existing-translation import without repeating pricing or deficit prose.
rails-i18n	Demonstrate the missing Spanish catalog the workflow actually supplies. Separate editable translation files from Rails outputs and use a small parsed-YAML exporter.
i18n-tasks	Scope Google backend evidence to what was tested. Keep GT generation and i18n-tasks checks distinct, align the Rails export command, and explain build failure in plain language.
mobility	Read the declared source language explicitly and save a complete translation response through the existing model. Keep the example small and connect GT context to database content.
nestjs-i18n	Generate the locales the example promises and use nestjs-i18n’s resolved language for GT runtime translation. Preserve existing catalogs, typed keys, and review.
symfony-translation	Keep PHP and Twig rendering, map existing regional locale names, and import reviewed YAML before generation. Remove the incorrect XLIFF conversion instruction.
in-house-i18n	Preserve the maintenance-cost argument, use verified plural authoring, and explain bundled runtime independence. Recognize translation services without changing the recommendation.
intlayer	Explain the JSX authoring and context advantage with a concrete meaning example. Use verified plural authoring and a component-by-component adoption path.
paraglide	Preserve the typed-function versus inline-source distinction. Scope the benchmark accurately, use verified plural authoring, and show a supported gradual migration.
locize	Keep existing i18next catalogs and reviewed translations while adding GT generation. Ground the four benefits in context, key maintenance, delivery, and migration.
tolgee	Add an equivalent tested GT Inbox example. Preserve all four benefits while grounding context quality in the actual JSX and removing repeated pricing copy.
weblate	Preserve release-time generation and all four benefits. Replace mandatory-wait and conflict-free claims with concrete workflow, context, review, and ownership advantages.

An independent sub-agent critiqued every changed passage and inspected the final examples and test assertions. All findings were resolved, including ambiguous build instructions, import sequencing, repeated review copy, and overly broad evidence or license claims.

Validation: all seven content validators pass; production build generates 595 pages; all 14 articles render at desktop and mobile widths with their tables/code blocks and no page-level horizontal overflow. Four exact GT JSX examples pass extraction and English/Spanish rendering with supplied catalogs. Focused Rails export, Mobility persistence, and Nest typecheck/concurrent-request checks pass. No repeated prose paragraphs of 20+ words remain across these 14 articles.

Hosted translation and a full Symfony application migration were not executed. The changes improve the answers and their evidence; AEO visibility gains require measurement after publication.

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk: medium. Left a non-blocking comment; this automation did not approve. Human review is needed for these 14 user-facing knowledge-base comparison rewrites, and no reviewers were assigned. Cursor Bugbot and Cursor Security Agent were not present after the first check poll.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router}

[cursor]

Risk: medium. Left a non-blocking comment; this automation did not approve. Human review is needed for these 14 user-facing knowledge-base comparison rewrites, and no reviewers were assigned.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router}