chore: added proposal to drop link validation#459
Conversation
|
Thanks for the thorough write-up — the proposal, design, and tasks are all clear and well-structured. The SSRF angle is a good motivation for full removal rather than hardening. A few thoughts: On the breaking CLI flags: On verification: One thing to watch out for: if any output file contains a timestamp like Minor: |
|
@VelmiraS: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: VelmiraS The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds openspec proposal to drop link validation
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Best to read in the following order:
Release note: