Skip to content

Remove "Type of change" section from PR default template#257

Merged
woocheol-lge merged 1 commit intomainfrom
github_template
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

Remove "Type of change" section from PR default template#257
woocheol-lge merged 1 commit intomainfrom
github_template

Conversation

@woocheol-lge
Copy link
Contributor

@woocheol-lge woocheol-lge commented Mar 4, 2026

Description

Remove "Type of change" section from PR default template

Signed-off-by: woocheol <jayden6659@gmail.com>
@woocheol-lge woocheol-lge requested a review from soimkim March 4, 2026 23:47
@woocheol-lge woocheol-lge self-assigned this Mar 4, 2026
@woocheol-lge woocheol-lge added the chore [PR/Issue] Refactoring, maintenance the code label Mar 4, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request removes the "Type of change" section from the pull request template file, simplifying the template structure. This involves deleting checkbox options previously available for contributors to categorize their contributions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Pull Request Template
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Removed the "Type of change" section containing checkbox options; template now concludes with a closing comment marker. Net change: 1 line added, 13 lines removed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: removing the 'Type of change' section from the PR template, which aligns perfectly with the actual modifications shown in the raw summary.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch github_template

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)

1-4: No automation dependencies found on the removed section.

The search found no automation, scripts, or workflows that depend on the "Type of change" section. However, CONTRIBUTING.md still references adding labels based on "type of changes" (line 11), which creates a minor documentation-template inconsistency. Consider clarifying the contribution guidelines to align with the simplified template or documenting where contributors should determine change types.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md around lines 1 - 4, Update CONTRIBUTING.md
to remove or clarify its reference to adding labels based on the "Type of
change" section (mentioned at the top of the PR template) so it matches the
simplified .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md; specifically, change the guidance
that currently instructs contributors to add labels from a "Type of change"
section to instead explain the new process for determining change types (e.g.,
list the labels and where maintainers will apply them or instruct contributors
to indicate change type in the PR description), and ensure the document mentions
the PR template title "Type of change" if you choose to keep an explicit field.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:
- Line 4: The file .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md is missing a trailing
newline; open the file and add a single newline character at the end of the file
(ensure the file ends with '\n') so the repository follows POSIX text file
conventions and avoids linting/CI warnings.

---

Nitpick comments:
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:
- Around line 1-4: Update CONTRIBUTING.md to remove or clarify its reference to
adding labels based on the "Type of change" section (mentioned at the top of the
PR template) so it matches the simplified .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md;
specifically, change the guidance that currently instructs contributors to add
labels from a "Type of change" section to instead explain the new process for
determining change types (e.g., list the labels and where maintainers will apply
them or instruct contributors to indicate change type in the PR description),
and ensure the document mentions the PR template title "Type of change" if you
choose to keep an explicit field.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9393f625-146f-4063-946c-77bae7e54cc6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ab6c87 and 72b9a59.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@woocheol-lge woocheol-lge merged commit f28be0e into main Mar 5, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@woocheol-lge woocheol-lge deleted the github_template branch March 5, 2026 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

chore [PR/Issue] Refactoring, maintenance the code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant