rfc: credible exit under encryption - #24
Open
parkan wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
hannahhoward
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2026
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
馃摉 Preview
Summary
The MST bucket design's credible-exit test (#4) and the merged encryption design are currently incompatible: the exit CAR is FEE ciphertext and the only keys that open it are custodied by Hilt, with no release mechanism specified.
This RFC names the break, defines what "credible" must survive (cooperative exit vs vendor-failure-resistant "Tier 2"), and proposes: a key-manifest CAR export (per-part CEKs re-wrapped to a customer key, second root in the exit CAR -- O(parts) key work, blobs and CIDs untouched) as the standard cooperative exit; versioned tenant key release for full-tenant departure; and an explicit yes/no on the Tier 2 promise. Tier 2 is provisional throughout -- this RFC ships Tier 1 only, and an affirmed Tier 2 gets its own follow-up RFC.
Note: one open question is deliberately merge-blocking -- whether Tier 2 is promised (direction, not design). The document should merge with that answer recorded.