🚩 server: show declined txns activity

[aguxez]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Declined activities now appear in activity listings (previously excluded).

• Chores

  • Added a patch release entry noting the change to show declined transaction activity.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 23d7045

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
@exactly/server	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 713c45ca-1614-477f-b538-2202c9861294

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f6074da and 23d7045.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .changeset/small-bees-invite.md
• server/api/activity.ts

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• server/api/activity.ts

---

Walkthrough

Removes the conditional filter that excluded declined activity items from the activity endpoint response, deletes the unused anvil import, and adds a changeset entry documenting a patch release that shows declined transactions activity.

Changes

Declined Activity Filter Removal

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Remove declined activity filter and update imports server/api/activity.ts, .changeset/small-bees-invite.md	Deletes the anvil import from viem/chains, removes the conditional .filter() that excluded items with status === "declined", so the activity response now includes those items; adds a changeset documenting the patch release.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• exactly/exa#1022: Modifies activity retrieval logic to exclude declined items, related to handling of declined activity data.
• exactly/exa#971: Also touches activity API handling of declined transactions.

Suggested reviewers

• nfmelendez
• cruzdanilo

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: removing the filter that excluded declined transactions from activity responses, allowing them to be displayed.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch declined-activities

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request removes the logic that filtered out declined activities from the activity API and removes the unused anvil chain import from server/api/activity.ts. A changeset is included to document this removal. I have no feedback to provide as there were no review comments.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f6074dacdc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e9bc77e9a3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[sentry]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.17%. Comparing base (4a80e4e) to head (23d7045).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1023      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.87%   73.17%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         241      241              
  Lines        9945    10079     +134     
  Branches     3246     3324      +78     
==========================================
+ Hits         7247     7375     +128     
- Misses       2406     2415       +9     
+ Partials      292      289       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	72.36% <ø> (-0.51%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.