🧪 [testing improvement] Add tests for CatalogSyncReport::has_errors - #23
🧪 [testing improvement] Add tests for CatalogSyncReport::has_errors#23edithatogo wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed
Tests were missing for
CatalogSyncReport::has_errors.📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested
Tests cover the logic when errors vector is empty (returning false) and when errors vector is not empty (returning true).
✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage
The method
CatalogSyncReport::has_errorsis now fully covered by tests and passes.PR created automatically by Jules for task 9386642974485398260 started by @edithatogo