FIX: allow link-only groups without categories#80
Merged
Conversation
Grubba27
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Migrating to the objects setting in ead985a neglected that some configurations were creating groups without any categories, consisting of only custom "extra links". This resulted in these custom-link-only groups being dropped.
This update covers this case for sites that haven't migrated yet, so link-only groups will now be migrated too. All links added will now gain an optional
show_in_groupsetting that can be used as an alternative to positioning custom links relative to categories.In worst case situations, where a custom "extra link" is added with no existing group name, the link will still render by falling back to the "ungrouped" section.
Included a spec to cover this.