Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
✅
|
Contributor
✅
|
Code coverage overviewLanguages: Go Go / code-coverage/go
Line coverage data for the main branch is not yet available. View coverage of the 10 most covered files.
ℹ️ Calculations represent line coverage. Results may change as calculations are updated. Updated |
Contributor
Author
@coderabbitai review |
Contributor
Action not completed
|
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 6 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
Contributor
Author
@codex review for provider account identity, read-only scope, and preservation of the admission cap |
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Contributor
Author
The existing protected headroom check reached the provider and correctly held the migration at its account limit. I exercised the new diagnosis against fixtures for an extra record, duplicate identities, and a changed roster. Required CI passed, and Codex reviewed this commit with no findings. The new diagnosis reads production only from a confirmed dispatch on main. Its first protected run is still required before acting on the account result. The diagnosis cannot change provider resources or clear migration admission. |
devantler
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 10, 2026 19:01
devantler
added this pull request to the merge queue
Nov 10, 2026
Any commits made after this event will not be merged.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
The storage migration needs an image-builder slot. A full provider inventory blocks that step before we can identify how the unmatched server is labeled.
What
Add a protected, read-only account census that reconciles the provider and cluster inventories and reports the classification of an unmatched server. Keep the existing capacity admission rule in place.
Part of #5731