Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
✅
|
Code coverage overviewLanguages: Go Go / code-coverage/go
Line coverage data for the main branch is not yet available. View coverage of the 10 most covered files.
ℹ️ Calculations represent line coverage. Results may change as calculations are updated. Updated |
Contributor
✅
|
Contributor
Author
Operator validation at The original hosted image build reproduced a Linux launch refusal. The revised hosted image workflow built both profiles. Its candidate job ran both binaries in the non-root, read-only container with no network, all capabilities dropped and privilege escalation disabled. The exact server 1.0.3 and CLI 1.0.14 checks passed. The legacy 0.16.27 verification job also passed. Both affected Go packages passed their full race suites. Both build recipes passed Hadolint after real Linux/amd64 initializer and pinned Web Interface staging. This PR is being evaluated as an image publication change. Live migration and sign-in require separate deployment and recovery validation. |
Contributor
Author
@coderabbitai review |
Contributor
Action not completed
|
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 22 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
Contributor
Author
@codex review |
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
devantler
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 10, 2026 18:44
devantler
added this pull request to the merge queue
Nov 10, 2026
Any commits made after this event will not be merged.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Email’s sign-in upgrade needs a deployable Stalwart candidate for staging before the production switch.
What
Build, verify and sign the pinned Stalwart 1.0.3 candidate in a separate image repository so it can be tested without changing the serving or recovery image.
Part of #5387