Skip to content

Name the platform Standard Environments in the README - #26

Merged
davidbzyk merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
se-brand-text
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

davidbzyk merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
se-brand-text

Conversation

@davidbzyk

@davidbzyk davidbzyk commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

General Environments is now Standard Environments at standardenvs.com. The README's product name and its blog link change; the article lives at standardenvs.com/blog/evaluation-refinement-loops/ and the old domain redirects there. Mentions of the general-environments repository (the vendored OKF tool, a test fixture's source, the tracked-paths comment) and the dated plans keep that name, because the repository keeps it.

RetriggerView in GreptileConfidence Score: 5/5

This documentation-only change appears safe to merge.

Summary

Updates README.md to name the platform Standard Environments.

  • The README names the platform Standard Environments and links to its new site.

Reviews (2) · Last reviewed commit: "Rename the two line-wrapped mentions too" · Reviewed by Greptile

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the README to refer to Standard Environments instead of General Environments in the introduction, research setup, review history, and evaluation instructions.
    • Updated related blog details, repository links, and attribution for example findings.

The README replaces General Environments with Standard Environments in its introduction, repository attribution, blog link, research setup, review-history example, and evaluation instructions.

Changes: README Platform Naming

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update platform references
README.md
The README updates the platform name and related link in its description, blog write-up, research setup, pull-request example, and evaluation instructions.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to b792f

The README update appears ready to merge after normal checks.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the README update that renames the platform to Standard Environments.
Description check Passed The description directly explains the platform rename, updated website and blog links, and retained repository references. It is related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage Passed No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches
Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
Simplify code
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

A rabbit reads the README with care,
New names and links are updated there.
The blog now points to a different place,
The setup notes reflect the name change.
The example and instructions align,
Then off hops the rabbit, satisfied.

Recent review info
Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Essentials
  • Run ID: 306b4758-bcea-4f05-b07d-5d8d4e037a09
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c49408 and b792fb7.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • README.md
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes: 1
  • README.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. 0 included reviews remain after this review. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 5 reviews per hour.

Recent review details
Context from checks skipped due to timeout: 2
  • GitHub Check: Greptile Review
  • GitHub Check: review

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Custom Code Review

1 finding on 5c49408 · 1 P3

codex-ci · gpt-6-luna · effort max · Codex 0.161.0

Comment thread README.md Resolved
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Custom Code Review

No issues found on b792fb7.

What the change does
  • README.md updates the business name and website from General Environments to Standard Environments in the introduction and blog link.
  • It also updates references to the company’s codebase in the results description, ground-truth setup, prior review example, and eval instructions.
  • The edits are confined to the README’s project overview and evaluation documentation.

codex-ci · gpt-6-luna · effort max · Codex 0.161.0

@davidbzyk
davidbzyk merged commit 15ed41e into main Nov 4, 2026
4 checks passed

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Custom Code Review

No issues found on b792fb7.

codex-ci · gpt-6-luna · effort max · Codex 0.161.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant