Repository navigation
Evals: the judge reads findings.json only again - #17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYour organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. Next included review available in 28 minutes. View limit details
Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The 12 voiceover tasks' grader, copied byte for byte from code_review_private #19: the judge reads the review from
findings.jsonin its working directory, nothing is pasted into its prompt, and the reward is recall alone. This is the grader the earlier luna and sol runs were measured with. Onlysteps/validator/tests/finish.pyandrubric/recall/prompt.mdchange in each task.