[VictorMoni]

Description

InvokeMethodRequest.http_verb = 'PATCH' raised ValueError because PATCH was missing from the request object's HTTP verb allowlist, even though the SDK's HTTP extension enum supports it. Add PATCH to that list.

Add regression coverage for accepting PATCH, rejecting invalid verbs, and clearing a configured verb. This change concerns the request object's setter; public gRPC invocation already recognizes PATCH.

Issue reference

Closes #1350.

Validation

• Reproduced the PATCH failure with the new test before applying the fix.
• Full unit suite: 2175 passed, 41 deselected, 188 subtests passed (Python 3.12; integration and example suites excluded).
• ruff check: passed.
• ruff format --check: 538 files already formatted.
• mypy: no issues in 230 source files.
• git diff --check: passed.
• The test process logged an OpenTelemetry exporter shutdown warning after the passing summary.

Checklist

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Reviewed documentation; no documentation changes needed for this validation fix

RELEASE NOTE: FIX Accept PATCH in InvokeMethodRequest HTTP verb validation.

[sicoyle]

great find! Thank you for this and for your interest in the Dapr Open Source project and community! Thank youu! 🚀

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.65%. Comparing base (6e26a49) to head (425e08e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1351      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.61%   88.65%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         165      165              
  Lines       13540    13540              
==========================================
+ Hits        11998    12004       +6     
+ Misses       1542     1536       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[VictorMoni]

Thank you so much for the review, @sicoyle, and for your support, @CasperGN! 😊

I'm really happy to contribute to the Dapr open-source community!

I was also wondering if there's a Holopin badge available for SDK contributors. If so, could either of you point me to how I can claim it?

Thanks again! 🚀

[sicoyle]

Thank you so much for the review, @sicoyle, and for your support, @CasperGN! 😊

I'm really happy to contribute to the Dapr open-source community!

I was also wondering if there's a Holopin badge available for SDK contributors. If so, could either of you point me to how I can claim it?

Thanks again! 🚀

There absolutely is!! @marcduiker could you please help a friend here? 😇