Skip to content

Auto-Scale Scheduler#64

Open
cicoyle wants to merge 3 commits into
dapr:mainfrom
cicoyle:feat-scheduler-auto-scaling
Open

Auto-Scale Scheduler#64
cicoyle wants to merge 3 commits into
dapr:mainfrom
cicoyle:feat-scheduler-auto-scaling

Conversation

@cicoyle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cicoyle cicoyle commented Sep 16, 2024

auto scale scheduler proposal.

This design is based off a white boarding session done w/ @JoshVanL, thanks! 🚀

Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <cassie@diagrid.io>
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md Outdated
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md Outdated
Comment thread 20240912-R-scheduler-auto-scale.md
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@artursouza artursouza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is good. I have 2 concerns:

  1. We should not be in the business of auto-scaling etcd, we should fix the first 1 or 3 scheduler instances to run with etcd. The problem is mostly with scaling down. Even going from 3 to 5 there is not a lot of value IMO.
  2. This proposal is getting into a great deal of detail that makes me wonder: if this is not a breaking change, can we do it in 1.16?

…confusion

Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <cassie@diagrid.io>
Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <cassie@diagrid.io>
@cicoyle cicoyle mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2024
22 tasks
@JoshVanL
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

JoshVanL commented Oct 3, 2024

+1 binding

1 similar comment
@yaron2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yaron2 commented Oct 3, 2024

+1 binding

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants