Protobuf v6#38
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Gasparetti <jgasparetti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Gasparetti <jgasparetti@gmail.com>
… packages; refactor library declarations in conformance package files. Signed-off-by: Jacopo Gasparetti <jgasparetti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Gasparetti <jgasparetti@gmail.com>
ecba670 to
8e3094f
Compare
|
Summary Changes
Notes
Keeping these versions aligned should help prevent inconsistencies and runtime issues. |
srikrsna-buf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the PR. To minimize breaking users, I would like to do this is multiple steps. Can we first update to v5 while supporting the old versions. AFAIK, this shouldn't be a breaking change.
Once that is released, we can cut a new version that supports v6 and above.
|
@jgasparetti let me know if you need help. I am also looking to support protobuf v6 in my packages. |
OK, I am going to work in that direction, from the first runs it seems that BuilderInfo.fromProto3Json and BuilderInfo.toProto3Json are removed and the generated proto are no longer working. I am going to test with an updated version of buf.build/protocolbuffers/dart respect to the v21 |
No description provided.