⚡️ Speed up function remove_trailing_yaml by 12%#7
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The optimization eliminates unnecessary variable assignment and function call overhead by directly inlining the string literal and its length. **Key changes:** 1. **Removed variable assignment**: Instead of storing `"\n...\n"` in `trailing_yaml`, the string literal is used directly in the `endswith()` call 2. **Hardcoded slice index**: Replaced `s[: -len(trailing_yaml)]` with `s[:-5]`, eliminating the `len()` function call **Why this is faster:** - Eliminates the overhead of variable creation and assignment (29.4% of original runtime) - Removes a function call to `len()` which was being executed on every match - The Python interpreter can optimize direct string literals better than variables **Performance characteristics:** The optimization shows consistent speedups across all test scenarios, with the most significant gains (20-30%) occurring when the trailing YAML pattern is actually found and removed. Even when the pattern isn't present, there's still a modest improvement (1-10%) from eliminating the variable assignment. The optimization is particularly effective for larger inputs with trailing patterns, where the `len()` call elimination provides more substantial benefits.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 12% (0.12x) speedup for
remove_trailing_yamlinhiggsfield/internal/experiment/params.py⏱️ Runtime :
29.2 microseconds→26.0 microseconds(best of489runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization eliminates unnecessary variable assignment and function call overhead by directly inlining the string literal and its length.
Key changes:
"\n...\n"intrailing_yaml, the string literal is used directly in theendswith()calls[: -len(trailing_yaml)]withs[:-5], eliminating thelen()function callWhy this is faster:
len()which was being executed on every matchPerformance characteristics:
The optimization shows consistent speedups across all test scenarios, with the most significant gains (20-30%) occurring when the trailing YAML pattern is actually found and removed. Even when the pattern isn't present, there's still a modest improvement (1-10%) from eliminating the variable assignment. The optimization is particularly effective for larger inputs with trailing patterns, where the
len()call elimination provides more substantial benefits.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_0kzwu12q/tmpo9hw74br/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_remove_trailing_yamlcodeflash_concolic_0kzwu12q/tmpo9hw74br/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_remove_trailing_yaml_2To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-remove_trailing_yaml-mglotke3and push.