Conversation
…talogue responses
hdamker
requested review from
bigludo7,
jlurien and
maxl2287
as code owners
September 23, 2026 19:11
maxl2287
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
correction
What this PR does / why we need it:
Brings
location-retrievalandlocation-verificationto Commonalities 0.9.0 (r4.4): bumpsx-camara-commonalities, re-syncs theadditional-error-responsestemplate, migrates the four deprecatedGeneric<status>responses to their r4.4 catalogue equivalents, repoints the local 422 examples at the new shared example pools, and removes 8 unused schema aliases absorbed from #433. No declared error-code set changes — every migration is an exact-code-set$refswap.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #434
Special notes for reviewers:
CI is green apart from the two
P-027warnings and theS-211findings this PR resolves; most items are not covered by any validation rule, so a passing pipeline should not be read as full r4.4 alignment on its own. The three renamed 422 identifier examples (GENERIC_422_*_IDENTIFIER_DEVICE) drop their localsummary:lines because a$refreplaces the whole example object — that's the shape Commonalities designed, not an accidental loss.Changelog input
Additional documentation
This section can be blank.