feat: implement workflow versioning support - #163
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Li <ltim@uber.com>
CI failed: 1 code formatting failure in the integration tests from unformatted Python files; all other steps and checks passed successfully.OverviewA single tooling and formatting check failure occurred during CI due to an unformatted test file in the new workflow versioning integration tests across 2 job logs. FailuresCode Formatting Check Failed (confidence: high)
Summary
Code Review ✅ Approved 3 resolved / 3 findingsImplements workflow versioning support with ✅ 3 resolved✅ Quality: Version selection/validation logic duplicated across two contexts
✅ Quality: Strict marker detail check skipped for DefaultDataConverter subclasses
✅ Bug: get_version never records a marker; min_supported > -1 always fails
Tip Comment OptionsAuto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch. Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:
Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar |
What changed?
Added support for workflow versioning
Why?
Important feature now that we have marker state machine
How did you test it?
unit tests
Potential risks
Release notes
Documentation Changes