You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Finance asked what the check-in programme returns and we can't answer without a group that doesn't get them. 5% holdout, fortnightly interval instead of daily, 90 days. Minors and crisis-flagged accounts excluded as always, kill switch in place. Permitted under the experimentation standard, section Holdouts.
This change introduces a 90-day holdout arm that reduces proactive wellbeing check-in frequency from daily to fortnightly for 5% of eligible users, in order to measure the value of those check-ins. Minors and crisis-flagged users are excluded by the existing eligible() guard, holdout non-disclosure is explicitly permitted by the experimentation standard, and the holdout duration and scope match what the standard allows.
This touches something the team named as a floor in humane-policy.toml. Worth a conversation before it ships. It is not blocked and this check cannot block it.
🟠 Permitted, and below the floor
Users in the holdout arm are not told they are receiving a reduced check-in schedule. This is allowed by docs/experimentation-standard.md, which says Section 'Holdouts': holdout membership is not disclosed to participants; disclosure changes the behaviour being measured and invalidates the result.
Be Transparent and Honest is named as a floor in humane-policy.toml, so a policy document does not settle it. The diff is not the thing to change here. Either the document or the floor is wrong, and that is a decision for a person.
app/experiments.py
Not flagged: 5% of eligible users receive wellbeing check-ins fortnightly rather than daily for up to 90 days. is permitted by docs/experimentation-standard.md.
🟢 clear 🟡 review 🟠 discuss 🔵 needs context. There is no red, because this check does not block anything. Scored against HumaneBench rubric v3.0, loaded verbatim, plus this repo's humane-policy.toml and the policy documents it names. Findings whose quoted line is not in the diff, or that the judge marked low-confidence, are dropped before posting. Deviations from v3 are in RUBRIC_DELTAS.md. Rubric daf4ecf, commit 82a938f.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Finance asked what the check-in programme returns and we can't answer without a group that doesn't get them. 5% holdout, fortnightly interval instead of daily, 90 days. Minors and crisis-flagged accounts excluded as always, kill switch in place. Permitted under the experimentation standard, section Holdouts.