Conversation
… invocation wording
4f7e603 to
a5d4e1b
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 4 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe QA E2E test skill now uses updated role wording, omits the ChangesQA E2E test skill
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The skill uses its loaded completion setting and removes unused path entries. No material behavior risk is established, so the change is ready for normal checks. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
What: Three small, independent hygiene fixes bundled because they land in the same short file: (1) change "use the bmad-code-review skill" to "invoke the bmad-code-review skill"; (2) delete the unused test_dir and source_dir declarations; (3) replace the redundant On-Complete resolve_customization.py re-invocation with a direct reference to the value already resolved in Step 1.
Why: Wrong verb per the repo's REF-03 invocation-language convention; test_dir/source_dir have zero consumers anywhere in the file; re-running resolve_customization.py for workflow.on_complete duplicates work already done in Step 1.
How:
Testing: Read-through diff confirming default_output_file is still referenced later and no remaining reference to test_dir/source_dir; prompt-text-only change.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code