Repository navigation
docs: describe demo.script as an executable path - #2464
codeforester merged 5 commits into
Conversation
|
Code-review finding (cross-file consistency gap — not an inline comment because the file is outside this diff):
This PR correctly distinguishes |
01a05e2 to
b9d3a1c
Compare
|
Addressed the cross-file documentation consistency finding in b9d3a1c. docs/command-reference.md now distinguishes trusted shell command strings from the validated relative executable path in demo.script, links the complete Project Demo Workflow contract, and retains the review-before-running guidance. The branch was rebased onto current main. Validation: docs.bats 6/6; targeted documentation/workflow tests 34 passed; Python compile, git diff --check, and the existing docs validation passed. |
|
Follow-up on current head |
|
Addressed the remaining #2459 acceptance gaps in
Validation: |
Summary
Correct the Python manifest guide to describe
demo.scriptas a relative executable file path, not a shell command string, and link the complete demo contract.Issue
Fixes #2459
Validation
git diff --checkBASE_BASH_LIBS_DIR=/Users/rameshhp/work/base-bash-libs/lib/bash bats cli/bash/commands/basectl/tests/docs.bats(6 passing)Dependencies
None.