Chore: Add code formatting in CI#9
Closed
antoinehng wants to merge 5 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Description
This PR introduces automated code formatting checks to the project's CI workflow to ensure consistent style and readability across contributions.
Ruff (https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/) was selected for this task due to its excellent performance, ease of configuration, and comprehensive support for modern Python features.
These improvements will help maintain code quality and streamline future contributions.
Closes #8
Changes included:
Code Checks Workflow: Implemented a new GitHub Actions workflow dedicated to code style checks using Ruff formatting.
Python Version Update: Added Python 3.13 to the CI test matrix.
Test Summary Fixes:
The additional fixes (Python version update and test summary comments) are "boyscout" changes. While it's generally better practice to separate distinct improvements into multiple PRs, these were included here to achieve a fully passing (green) CI workflow.