Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal
Test a paid operational-control use case with contractor payroll and union remittance operators. This is a research hypothesis, not evidence of product demand.
What this branch does
PRODUCT_AGENT.md, a buyer-evidence gate and a reviewable branch/PR build loop.Verification
python -m unittest discover -s products/fringe_proof -p 'test_*.py' -v— 5 passed.Sample CLI exits 2 and reports 3 synthetic discrepancies (expected), including a fund receipt that matches a submitted amount while payroll-derived amounts differ.
Limits before a real pilot
Next buyer gate
An outside payroll operator, using authorized records and existing tools, confirms a previously unknown actionable discrepancy or recurring review time saved and pays for continued use. No automatic merge or deployment.