Skip to content

arm64: dts: apple: adt-coverage: add the J716s (M5 Pro) - #1203

Merged
RyanTheTide merged 1 commit into
integration/aurorafrom
t6050/adt-coverage-j716s
Nov 8, 2026
Merged

RyanTheTide merged 1 commit into
integration/aurorafrom
t6050/adt-coverage-j716s

Conversation

@RyanTheTide

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Puts T6050 under the ADT coverage ratchet from #1111. The J716s is the first T6050 board with a tree in integration that someone has booted, so it gets the inventory.

  • adt-coverage/t6050-j716s.txt: every device in the J716s ADT, its address and its node in t6050-j716s.dtb, or MISSING. Device names, addresses and DT paths only.
  • waivers.txt: the J716s's virtual PMGR votes, the same rule as the J616s's.
  • dt-checks.yml: the J716s joins the boards whose inventory must exist.

Counts: MISSING 941, mapped 155, waived 507. With #1202 the board maps 599 and MISSING drops to 692, which the ratchet allows.

Checked with scripts/dtc/apple-adt-coverage.py against the J716s DTB of current integration: 0 broken paths, baseline bootstrapped from the head inventory.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add an ADT coverage inventory for the J716s, the first T6050 board in
the DT checks' coverage ratchet. It lists every device of the J716s
ADT (the macOS 27.2 board tree), its translated address and the DT node
it maps to in t6050-j716s.dtb, or MISSING. Nothing beyond device names,
addresses and DT paths is in it.

The J716s's virtual PMGR votes, the power-devices records without a
power-state register in the ADT's table, are waived like the J616s's.

MISSING 941, mapped 155, waived 507. Most of the gap is the T6050
hardware the board tree does not describe yet; the ratchet now keeps
that number from growing.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Ryan Murray <81541646+RyanTheTide@users.noreply.github.com>
@RyanTheTide
RyanTheTide merged commit b98fa42 into integration/aurora Nov 8, 2026
2 checks passed
@RyanTheTide
RyanTheTide deleted the t6050/adt-coverage-j716s branch November 8, 2026 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant