Remote Shell Swap Bug -> main - #1052
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 30 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughChangesCross-machine lane behavior
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/desktop/src/renderer/state/crossMachineLanes.ts`:
- Around line 383-394: The foreign lane ordering input uses a non-unique bare
lane ID, preventing composite manual-order entries from matching across
machines. In apps/desktop/src/renderer/state/crossMachineLanes.ts lines 383-394,
update crossMachineLaneOrderInput to use the composite machine-and-lane ID. In
apps/desktop/src/renderer/state/crossMachineLanes.test.ts lines 177-216, add a
named regression test with two machines sharing a lane ID and verify composite
manualOrder determines their order.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: b67eb1b6-22c4-41c8-827d-5052f48dfe1c
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/features/terminals-and-sessions/README.mdis excluded by!docs/**
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/desktop/src/renderer/components/terminals/SessionListPane.tsxapps/desktop/src/renderer/state/crossMachineLanes.test.tsapps/desktop/src/renderer/state/crossMachineLanes.ts
|
@codex review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Summary by CodeRabbit