[Feature Request]: Add support for Radxa ZERO 3W on the ZERO 3 page

[MegaCode111REAL]

Which feature would you like to have?

The ZERO 3W shares the RK3566 platform with the ZERO 3 and appears to be sufficiently compatible with the existing Armbian target. It could ZERO 3W under the existing ZERO 3 target, or maybe a separate board configuration would be better?

Funding

• I am willing to cover expenses

[github-actions]

Hey @MegaCode111REAL! 👋

Thanks for opening your first issue with the Armbian project — we’re glad to have you here! 🧡
Your input doesn’t just help us improve the project — it benefits everyone who uses Armbian.

If you'd like to stay informed about project updates or collaborate more closely with the team,
you can optionally share some personal contact preferences at armbian.com/update-data.
This helps us keep in touch without relying solely on GitHub notifications.

Also, don’t forget to ⭐ star the repo to support the work — and welcome aboard! 🚀

[EvilOlaf]

Both the 3W and 3E were merged into a unified image with auto selection of correct dt via uboot and should work that way.
Perhaps it would be sufficient to replace the board name with something like BOARD_NAME="Radxa ZERO 3 series" ? Or BOARD_NAME="Radxa ZERO 3W/3E"

[igorpecovnik]

with something like BOARD_NAME="Radxa ZERO 3 series" ? Or BOARD_NAME="Radxa ZERO 3W/3E"

Currently this will be making some troubles as in most cases of "similar boards", they are usually physically not the same. Rpi is fine example: https://armbian.com/boards?vendor=rpi-foundation solved this way https://github.com/armbian/armbian.github.io/blob/main/release-targets/reusable.yml

Today we can add it there and adding a new picture which grows download pages, but not images.

And then we have 1st run recognizing ...
#10554

We might need to develop some common way to cover all this.