Decouple the control plane from the data plane on receive queues#8892
Draft
GGraziadei wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Decouple the control plane from the data plane on receive queues#8892GGraziadei wants to merge 1 commit into
GGraziadei wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of the change
Fixes #8816
A Storm executor multiplexes two fundamentally different kinds of traffic onto its single inbound JCQueue:
traffic that backpressure is meant to throttle.
This PR introduces an optional control receive queue. When enabled, this dedicated queue is prioritized and completely drained before the standard data queue is processed. This ensures that critical coordination traffic bypasses data plane bottlenecks.
For additional context and technical details, please refer to the discussion inside the issue thread.
How was the change tested