test: add range-partitioned sorted time-bin aggregation coverage

[NGA-TRAN]

Which issue does this PR close?

• Related to Support functions date_bin and date_trunc in range partition satisfaction #23569 (skip hash shuffle for GROUP BY key, date_bin(timestamp) on Range([timestamp])).
• Related to Support streaming aggregates when partitions are unsorted but non‑overlapping #24438.

This PR does not close those issues; it only pins today's plan. A follow-up will update the expected plan once the shuffle is removed.

Rationale for this change

Adds a table that matches a common metrics layout:

• columns key, zone, host, pod, service, timestamp, value
• range-partitioned on timestamp into two 60-minute file groups
• sorted within each file on (key, timestamp)

and pins today's physical plan for:

SELECT key, date_bin(INTERVAL '60 seconds', timestamp) AS time_bin, sum(value)
FROM metrics_range_sorted
WHERE service = 'a'
GROUP BY key, time_bin

The scan already advertises Range([timestamp]), output_ordering=[key, timestamp], and two parallel file groups. Time bins do not straddle the hour split, so (key, time_bin) is partition-disjoint.

Today DataFusion still inserts a hash RepartitionExec between Partial and Final, even though ordering_mode=Sorted is already recognized. This PR documents that plan so a follow-up can remove the shuffle and the expected plan will shrink to a single SinglePartitioned aggregate.

What changes are included in this PR?

• Register metrics_range_sorted for sqllogictests.
• EXPLAIN + result coverage for the filtered and unfiltered queries.

Are these changes tested?

This PR is tests only.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

Test plan

• cargo test --test sqllogictests -- range_sorted_time_bin_agg.slt
• CI sqllogictests

[NGA-TRAN]

@jayshrivastava : Can you help review this? These are tests for your ticket #23569.

@xavlee : can you review this, too? It will be useful for #24438

CC: @gene-bordegaray and @gabotechs

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.31%. Comparing base (e2e161d) to head (6006096).
⚠️ Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #24500      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.27%   81.31%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1114     1117       +3     
  Lines      393619   396012    +2393     
  Branches   393619   396012    +2393     
==========================================
+ Hits       319931   322008    +2077     
- Misses      54950    55181     +231     
- Partials    18738    18823      +85     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gene-bordegaray]

I will review in depth tomorrow, at a first glance this looks nice 👍

[xavlee]

This will be addressed in #24438 👍

[gene-bordegaray]

non blocking boiler plate suggestion.

cc: @gabotechs

[gabotechs]

Nice! thanks @NGA-TRAN for the PR and @gene-bordegaray and @xavlee for the reviews!

[alamb]

since this is a test let's just merge it in -- I don't think it is needed to wait for 24 hours. We can update the tests as a follow on if anyone has any other thoughts