MINOR: [CI] Add Acero CODEOWNER#50426
Open
zanmato1984 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
zanmato1984
requested review from
assignUser,
jonkeane,
kou and
raulcd
as code owners
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the repository’s CODEOWNERS configuration to route review requests for the C++ Acero component to a specific maintainer, as a follow-up to prior ownership changes.
Changes:
- Add a CODEOWNERS entry for
cpp/src/arrow/aceropointing to@zanmato1984.
zanmato1984
force-pushed
the
codex/add-zanmato-acero-codeowner
branch
from
a1168d8 to
98c6282
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Follow-up to #50420.
What changes are included in this PR?
Add an explicit Acero CODEOWNERS entry.
Are these changes tested?
No; CODEOWNERS-only change.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.