[Amber] Fix: [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #524

github-actions · 2026-01-23T17:48:43Z

Automated Fix by Amber Agent

This PR addresses issue #523 using the Amber background agent.

Changes Summary

Action Type: refactor
Commit: ef1b2c1
Triggered by: Issue label/command

Pre-merge Checklist

All linters pass
All tests pass
Changes follow project conventions (CLAUDE.md)
No scope creep beyond issue description

Reviewer Notes

This PR was automatically generated. Please review:

Code quality and adherence to standards
Test coverage for changes
No unintended side effects

🤖 Generated with Amber Background Agent

Closes #523

…enclature - Use "SpecKit" (capital S and K) in workflow greeting messages - Add specific command suggestions for SpecKit workflows (/speckit.specify, /speckit.plan, /speckit.tasks, /speckit.implement) - Update runner greeting generation logic to detect SpecKit workflows - Improve frontend welcome message punctuation consistency Resolves #523 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

jeremyeder · 2026-01-29T03:30:18Z

components/runners/claude-code-runner/main.py

+
+        # Create appropriate greeting based on workflow type
+        if "speckit" in workflow_name.lower() or "spec-kit" in workflow_name.lower():
+            greeting = f"Greet the user and explain that the {display_name} workflow is now active. Briefly describe what this workflow helps with based on the systemPrompt in ambient.json. Mention that they can use commands like /speckit.specify to create specifications, /speckit.plan for implementation planning, /speckit.tasks for task generation, and /speckit.implement to execute the plan. Keep it concise and friendly."


remove "based on the systemPrompt in ambient.json" we just removed it from all the other workflows. its causing issues.

jeremyeder · 2026-01-29T03:30:34Z

components/runners/claude-code-runner/main.py

+        if "speckit" in workflow_name.lower() or "spec-kit" in workflow_name.lower():
+            greeting = f"Greet the user and explain that the {display_name} workflow is now active. Briefly describe what this workflow helps with based on the systemPrompt in ambient.json. Mention that they can use commands like /speckit.specify to create specifications, /speckit.plan for implementation planning, /speckit.tasks for task generation, and /speckit.implement to execute the plan. Keep it concise and friendly."
+        else:
+            greeting = f"Greet the user and explain that the {display_name} workflow is now active. Briefly describe what this workflow helps with based on the systemPrompt in ambient.json. Keep it concise and friendly."


same here. reference to ambient.json has to be removed.

…t greeting

github-actions · 2026-01-29T04:45:01Z

Claude Code Review

Summary

This PR was automatically generated by Amber to address issue #523. The changes update nomenclature for the SpecKit workflow's welcome greeting and command suggestions. However, the PR contains unresolved merge conflicts that must be fixed before merging.

Issues by Severity

🚫 Blocker Issues

1. Unresolved Merge Conflicts in main.py

Location: components/runners/claude-code-runner/main.py (lines 1000-1560)
Problem: The file contains Git conflict markers (<<<<<<< HEAD, =======, >>>>>>> origin/main)
Impact: Code will not run, Python syntax errors
Locations of conflicts:
- Lines 1000-1015: Duplicate code block with conflict markers
- Lines 1484-1502: INITIAL_PROMPT handling logic conflict
- Lines 1510-1514: Import statement conflict
- Lines 1522-1527: asyncio.sleep(3) vs no delay conflict
- Lines 1535-1550: SpecKit nomenclature greeting logic conflict (the actual fix)

Required Action: Resolve all merge conflicts by choosing the correct version for each section. Based on the PR description (updating SpecKit nomenclature), the HEAD version (lines 1088-1098 and 1536-1547) should be kept for the greeting logic.

🔴 Critical Issues

2. Massive Code Duplication (1500+ lines)

Location: components/runners/claude-code-runner/main.py (lines 22-1560)
Problem: The entire file appears to be duplicated/appended to itself
Evidence:
- Line 22: from ag_ui.core import EventType, RunErrorEvent (duplicate import)
- Line 1376: Docstring starts again: """AG-UI Server entry point...
- Lines 1377-1560: Duplicate of earlier code with different state
Impact:
- File bloat (1500 unnecessary lines)
- Maintenance nightmare
- Potential runtime issues with duplicate definitions
- Violates DRY principle

3. Python Code Standards Violations

Location: components/runners/claude-code-runner/main.py
Problem: Code quality issues if file is not properly cleaned
- Incorrect import placement (line 22 is orphaned)
- Missing final newline (line 1560)

Required Action: Run code formatter after resolving conflicts:

cd components/runners/claude-code-runner
black main.py
isort main.py
flake8 main.py

🟡 Major Issues

4. Frontend Change Appears Unrelated to Issue

Location: components/frontend/src/app/projects/[name]/sessions/[sessionName]/components/welcome-experience.tsx:30
Change: Added period to SETUP_MESSAGE: "Great! Give me a moment to get set up."
Issue: This is a trivial punctuation fix unrelated to SpecKit nomenclature
Concern: Scope creep - PR should focus only on SpecKit workflow greeting updates
Recommendation: This change is acceptable but should have been mentioned in PR description

🔵 Minor Issues

5. Missing Context in PR Description

PR body does not explain what the nomenclature change is ("spec-kit" → "SpecKit"?)
No mention of the frontend punctuation fix
No explanation of what specific problem in issue [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #523 is being addressed

6. No Test Coverage Mentioned

PR does not indicate if changes were tested
No mention of manual testing or automated test runs
SpecKit workflow greeting logic is complex - should verify it works correctly

Positive Highlights

✅ Security: Token redaction patterns are maintained in cloning logic (lines 1010-1013, 922-925)
✅ Error Handling: Proper error logging with context throughout
✅ Frontend: Follows Shadcn UI patterns, proper component structure
✅ Intent: Standardizing nomenclature ("SpecKit" vs "spec-kit") is good for consistency

Recommendations

Immediate Actions (Before Merge)

CRITICAL: Resolve all merge conflicts in main.py
- Keep the HEAD version for SpecKit nomenclature logic (lines 1088-1098, 1536-1547)
- Remove all conflict markers
- Verify no code duplication remains
CRITICAL: Remove duplicate code (lines 22-1375 appear to duplicate existing code)
- File should be ~1500 lines shorter after cleanup
- Ensure only one complete version of each function exists

Run Python linters:

cd components/runners/claude-code-runner
black main.py
isort main.py
flake8 main.py

Verify file integrity:

python -m py_compile main.py  # Check syntax

Test the changes:
- Deploy to test environment
- Activate SpecKit workflow
- Verify greeting uses "SpecKit" nomenclature
- Verify command suggestions are correct
- Test that non-SpecKit workflows still work

Post-Merge Actions

Update issue [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #523 with details of what was changed
Add test case for SpecKit workflow greeting (prevent regression)

Risk Assessment

CANNOT MERGE - Blocker issues present
Risk Level: 🔴 HIGH - Code will not run due to merge conflicts

Adherence to Standards

❌ CLAUDE.md Python Standards: Merge conflicts violate all standards
❌ Git Workflow: Unresolved conflicts should not reach PR stage
✅ Frontend Standards: welcome-experience.tsx follows patterns correctly
⚠️ Testing: No evidence of testing performed

Reviewer: Claude Code Review (Automated)
Review Date: 2026-01-29
Based on: CLAUDE.md, backend-development.md, frontend-development.md, security-standards.md

🔍 View AI decision process (logs available for 90 days)

📋 View memory system files loaded (click to expand)

What Amber Loaded for Code Review

Amber automatically loaded these repository standards from the memory system:

CLAUDE.md - Master project instructions, development standards
backend-development.md - Go backend, K8s integration patterns
frontend-development.md - NextJS, Shadcn UI, React Query patterns
security-standards.md - Auth, RBAC, token handling
k8s-client-usage.md - User token vs service account patterns
error-handling.md - Consistent error patterns
react-query-usage.md - Data fetching patterns

Impact: This review used your repository's specific code quality standards, security patterns, and best practices from the memory system (PRs #359, #360) - not just generic code review guidelines.

github-actions bot added amber-generated PR created by Amber background agent auto-fix refactor labels Jan 23, 2026

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2026

[Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #523

Open

3 tasks

jeremyeder reviewed Jan 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Resolve merge conflict: combine INTERACTIVE session logic with SpecKi…

b061786

…t greeting

bobbravo2 added this to the v0.0.20 milestone Jan 30, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[Amber] Fix: [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #524

[Amber] Fix: [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #524

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

jeremyeder Jan 29, 2026

Uh oh!

jeremyeder Jan 29, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

What Amber Loaded for Code Review

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

[Amber] Fix: [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #524

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[Amber] Fix: [Amber Refactor] Update the Start spec-kit workflow's welcome greeting and subsequent command suggestions with proper nomenclature #524

Uh oh!

Conversation

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Automated Fix by Amber Agent

Changes Summary

Pre-merge Checklist

Reviewer Notes

Uh oh!

jeremyeder Jan 29, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jeremyeder Jan 29, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Claude Code Review

Summary

Issues by Severity

🚫 Blocker Issues

🔴 Critical Issues

🟡 Major Issues

🔵 Minor Issues

Positive Highlights

Recommendations

Immediate Actions (Before Merge)

Post-Merge Actions

Risk Assessment

Adherence to Standards

What Amber Loaded for Code Review

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading