You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Full-FT offload is host-bound: measure resident device AdamW and update the placement model #34
After resident host buffers (#26), 8B full FT on one RNGD runs at 6.2–6.4 s/step; two cards are slower (9.26 s/step, #30) because host copies and host AdamW (24 cores), not the PCIe links, set the step time. The paper's §5.3 optimizer-placement model still uses link bandwidth as the cost.
Evidence
experiments/2026-10-21-two-card-split.md: summed D2H 4.0 → 5.2 s and AdamW 7.1 → 9.7 s with two cards; model predicted 5.6 s, measured 9.26 s.
Scope
Precompile the resident AdamW graphs on a dedicated CPU node (npu-lora compile --full --resident-layers N; did not finish in 2.5 h on a shared node).
Measure 1 and 2 cards with about 8 resident layers per card.
Replace the link term in the placement model with host copy + host AdamW throughput.
Done when
Step time with resident layers is measured on RNGD and the model predicts it within 15 %.
Done-when met. Resident step time was measured on RNGD, and the host-copy + host-AdamW model (docs/design.md, updated in #42 and #45) predicts it within 15 %:
Activity
Resident device AdamW: compile in 150 s, RNGD measurements, host-thro…
Low-load resident timing for #34 and the step model; docs for the #40 …
Low-load resident timing for #34 and the step model; docs for the #40 …
Fix resident-AdamW OOM on DRAM_SHARED: serialize device allocations w…
Resident AdamW: 200 steps on 2 RNGD x 8 layers without OOM (#40) + 1-…
gspark-etri commentedon Oct 21, 2026
Done-when met. Resident step time was measured on RNGD, and the host-copy + host-AdamW model (docs/design.md, updated in #42 and #45) predicts it within 15 %: