Skip to content

[AAASM-2313] 🔧 (release): Bump python-sdk to 0.0.1a3 + refresh release intent#69

Merged
Chisanan232 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
v0.0.1/AAASM-2313/config/bump_alpha_3
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

[AAASM-2313] 🔧 (release): Bump python-sdk to 0.0.1a3 + refresh release intent#69
Chisanan232 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
v0.0.1/AAASM-2313/config/bump_alpha_3

Conversation

@Chisanan232
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Chisanan232 Chisanan232 commented Jun 1, 2026

Description

Bump pyproject.toml + __init__.py + uv.lock to 0.0.1a3 (PEP 440 form of v0.0.1-alpha.3 tag). Also refresh release-title.md + release-notes.md for alpha-3 content.

Note on master state pre-bump: pyproject.toml was at 0.0.2 (auto-bumped by alpha-2 release workflow's level: patch logic), while agent_assembly/__init__.py was still at 0.0.1a2 (only pyproject was auto-bumped). Both now consistent at 0.0.1a3.

Related Issues

— Claude Code (Opus 4.7, 1M context)

Manual bump from 0.0.2 (auto-bumped by alpha-2 release workflow)
back to 0.0.1a3 to align with the v0.0.1-alpha.3 tag intent.
__init__.py was lagging at 0.0.1a2 since the alpha-2 auto-bump
only touched pyproject.toml — both now consistent.

Centralized release workflow's `intent.yaml level: patch` may
auto-bump again on tag-push; that's a known issue (see ticket
AAASM-2313 notes). The `Release Python SDK` workflow reads
pyproject.toml directly so it should build 0.0.1a3 wheels.

release-title.md + release-notes.md refreshed for alpha-3 content
focused on the 3 release-infra fixes verified by this tag.

Tracked: AAASM-2313
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

@Chisanan232
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Chisanan232 commented Jun 1, 2026

Claude Code review — AAASM-2313

CI state

30 SUCCESS + 10 SKIPPED, 0 failuresmergeable=MERGEABLE, mergeStateStatus=CLEAN. The 10 SKIPPED checks are all by-design for PR context (same pattern as alpha-2's PR #67):

All 30 actually-applicable checks pass: full pytest matrix (3.13 × 4 OS combinations × unit + integration), Test Type Imports (AAASM-2053 work), python-build-check / Python Package test, Validation Summary, SonarCloud, Codecov.

Scope vs. AC

AC Verified Status
pyproject.toml version 0.0.20.0.1a3 yes — note the deliberate backwards-step from 0.0.2 (auto-bumped artifact from alpha-2 release workflow) to align with the v0.0.1-alpha.3 tag intent
agent_assembly/__init__.py __version__0.0.1a3 yes — and importantly, this was at 0.0.1a2 on master (drift since alpha-2's auto-bump only touched pyproject). Both now consistent.
uv.lock regenerated yes — Updated agent-assembly v0.0.2 -> v0.0.1a3 per local run
release-title.md refreshed yes — v0.0.1-alpha.3 — release-infra fixes verification
release-notes.md refreshed yes — covers the 3 release-infra fixes (AAASM-2188/2189/2190)
intent.yaml correct (no edit needed) yes — artifacts.docs: skip from PR #66 still in place

Caveat about the centralized release workflow

intent.yaml has release: true; level: patch. On tag push, the centralized release workflow's Bump Version and Commit step will auto-bump 0.0.1a3 to something else (likely 0.0.4 — patch-bump of 0.0.3, ignoring the pre-release identifier per its bump logic) and publish that to PyPI. The MANUAL bump to 0.0.1a3 here is for the Release Python SDK workflow which reads pyproject.toml directly when building wheels — those wheels will be 0.0.1a3. The version-coordination weirdness is a pre-existing concern (see AAASM-2313 description) and not something this PR is trying to fix.

Verdict

Ready for human approval and merge. All by-design skips, no actionable failures.

— Claude Code (Opus 4.7, 1M context)

@Chisanan232 Chisanan232 merged commit 7b20aeb into master Jun 1, 2026
40 checks passed
@Chisanan232 Chisanan232 deleted the v0.0.1/AAASM-2313/config/bump_alpha_3 branch June 1, 2026 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant