Repository navigation
test: expand Pharos coverage for ModDB reports - #21
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Validation
./tests/OptiTime.Pharos.Tests/build.sh --filter 'FullyQualifiedName~ModDbReportRelatedTests': 7/7 passed in 9m14s on Vintage Story 1.22.7 with Pharos 0.6.0; isolated HOME, temporary data, and caches../tests/OptiTime.Pharos.Tests/build.sh --filter 'FullyQualifiedName~VanillaIronAnvilCanBePlacedThroughClientInput': 1/1 passed in 48s after clarifying the test name.Scope
These scenarios check related vanilla paths. The reporters' exact saves, mod lists, and logs are unavailable, so the scenarios do not establish that every report is resolved. The anvil case checks client driven placement; it does not test crafting or reproduce the reported crash.