Commercial Research Beta release candidate#113
Conversation
Verified implementation update — quarterly cash-generation evidenceImplemented the approved no-file design across four coherent commits:
Evidence and safety boundaries
Verification
Product and market-maturity assessmentThis is a meaningful methodology-maturity improvement: Company Workbench can now distinguish operating profitability from cash conversion, preserves source lineage, and gives a clearer answer-first research workflow. It improves reliability, extensibility, and reviewer trust. It does not prove real-company coverage, licensed source operation, hosted reliability, reviewer adoption, commercial demand, calibration quality, product-market fit, or market validation. The product remains a local Commercial Research Beta release candidate. Exact next executable stepContinue with a local one-company quarterly source-adapter acceptance contract using reviewed explicit inputs and no broad coverage refresh. Actual real-company activation remains |
Verified implementation update — quarterly cash-generation adapter acceptanceImplemented and pushed a one-company, in-memory acceptance harness for prospective quarterly cash-generation adapters. What is now covered
Boundary preserved
Verification
Commits: |
|
Verified mobile Personal Research first-action density update:
PR remains draft. This improves local usability maturity; it does not prove permitted source activation, hosted reliability, external reviewer demand, calibration quality, commercial demand, or product-market fit. |
|
Verified reliability follow-up — declared-date readiness freshness:
PR remains draft. The branch is safe for code review, but the pilot package must not be called ready until an intentional reviewed readiness rebuild is authorized and its generated diff is inspected. |
|
Verified slice: no-write readiness impact preview
Commits through 3fd088f. Branch is pushed and aligned. PR remains draft; do not merge. |
Verified implementation update — Personal Research evidence detour continuityCurrent verified HEAD: What changed
Verification
Artifact and evidence boundary
Product maturity effectThis improves workflow-continuity maturity: a researcher can inspect blocked inputs or proof and return to the selected company without losing context or changing workspaces. It does not prove market demand, hosted reliability, source rights, external reviewer adoption, calibrated prediction, or product-market fit. Next executable external laneAfter one permitted reviewed point-in-time consensus CSV or configured rights-appropriate provider exists, run one bounded preview:
Do not perform broad collection, record snapshots, rebuild readiness, or generate evidence artifacts without the separate reviewed input and approval boundary. Overall continuation remains active; this draft PR must not be merged or publicly deployed. |
Verified reliability update — stale-readiness continuation routingCurrent verified HEAD: What changed
Verification
Artifact and product boundary
Remaining gatesPoint-in-time consensus remains After a permitted reviewed consensus file exists, the exact bounded resume command remains:
PR remains draft. Do not merge or deploy. |
Verified follow-up — complete stale-readiness operator routingCurrent verified HEAD: This follow-up closes the remaining source-preflight and Advanced Data Health bypasses after the earlier continuation-gate update. Additional changes
Verification
Local cache disclosureDuring live validation, The product remains a local Commercial Research Beta release candidate. This improves operating reliability; it does not satisfy source, hosted, reviewer, calibration, market-validation, or operated-platform gates. PR remains open and draft. Do not merge or deploy. |
Final verified state for this continuation runCurrent HEAD: The stale-readiness continuation gate now covers Project Status, Session Source Preflight, Provider Setup, Coverage Frontier, Auto-Refresh Status and runbook, Advanced Data Health cards, machine-readable output, and the commercial-beta release path. Final verification:
Tracked/staged generated artifact churn remains zero. The existing ignored session-source-preflight JSON cache rewrite is disclosed in the prior comment and remains untracked. The exact next reviewed decision is whether to authorize a separate PR remains open and draft. Do not merge or deploy. |
Readiness promotion evidence review — verified local sliceThis slice extends the existing no-write readiness preview with a separate fail-closed evidence review for proposed fundamentals and DCF promotions. Verified inspection result:
Boundaries preserved:
Verification:
Commits:
Next executable local lane: audit the remaining non-promotion readiness changes and the missing DCF price-source lineage without writing generated artifacts or editing source rights. |
Readiness change-cause review — verified local sliceThe same no-write readiness preview now explains major saved-versus-proposed transitions using named, tested method reasons. Current in-memory transition evidence:
Boundaries:
Verification:
Commits:
Next executable local step: audit the DCF price-source lineage gap without writing or modifying canonical price/readiness artifacts. |
|
Remediation 6 is complete and independently approved at exact head The second whole-branch review found and this slice closes four cross-slice issues:
Evidence:
PR remains draft. No readiness rebuild, provider fetch, broad refresh, generated report/screenshot/timing command, merge, or deployment was performed. Priority 4 remains externally incomplete pending a permitted independently reviewed real dataset, direct source-rights evidence, and accepted expected membership count/digest. Next gates are exact-head CI and a third fresh whole-branch engineering review. |
|
The third whole-branch review found one final Minor aggregate-resource issue; it is fixed and independently approved at exact head The combined four-contract budget now constrains every descriptor read by both the per-file limit and the remaining aggregate allowance, with remaining+1 overflow detection. Exact aggregate boundaries pass; the next contract cannot be fully read or retained after the aggregate budget is exhausted. Per-file error precedence, legal short reads, same-descriptor metadata checks, race rejection, and immutable verified snapshots remain covered. Verification at the reviewed head:
PR stays draft. No readiness/provider/generated report/screenshot/timing operation, merge, or deployment occurred. Next gates are exact-head CI and a fourth fresh whole-branch review. Priority 4 external real-data, direct-rights, expected-count/digest, hosted, and market-validation gates remain open. |
|
The fourth whole-branch review found one structured-input Minor; it is now fixed and independently approved at exact head Deeply nested but byte-bounded manifest JSON and hash-bound source-rights YAML now fail through stable Verification:
PR remains draft. No readiness/provider/generated report/screenshot/timing operation, merge, or deployment occurred. Next gates: exact-head CI and a fifth fresh whole-branch review. External Priority 4 real-data, source-rights, expected-count/digest, hosted, and market-validation gates remain open. |
|
Remediation 7 is complete and independently approved at exact head This closes the V5 trust-boundary findings:
Verification:
PR remains draft. No readiness/provider/generated report/screenshot/timing operation, merge, or deployment occurred. Next gates are exact-head CI and a sixth fresh whole-branch review. External Priority 4 real-data, direct source-rights, expected-count/digest, hosted, and market-validation gates remain open. |
Current stage
Local Commercial Research Beta release candidate. Priority 4 remains frozen; the first provider-neutral Priority 6 workspace-authorization slice is implemented, hardened, reviewed, documented, and exact-head verified at
369da3a13cac2016300d4b8f08e2306d0f1bac7f.PR #113 remains open and draft. Do not merge or deploy publicly. The product remains research-only and is not a hosted, calibrated, externally validated, production-operated, or investment-decision product.
Product workflow
Priority 6 workspace authorization slice
The approved design and test-first plan are:
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-26-provider-neutral-workspace-authorization-design.mddocs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-26-provider-neutral-workspace-authorization.mdImplementation lineage:
9cdd8be024d543bc4f3bf3df67eed74a1d80533d— frozen trust-boundary types, exact structural validation, and fail-closed malformed-input behavior867556cd6cc196028f76400c675a746f8c5d309c— user-approved audit-field plan clarificationb6108a3629ee94f9c191f6488e76f7d6e7e9c015— deterministic principal/workspace isolation, least-privilege policy matrix, append-only protection, and audit obligations3c5a2bc8fc47ac144290087e9dad513bb683252c— architecture, roadmap, continuation-contract, and public documentation evidence90b441d25e97655e887803d88f4730497e71e383— final trust-boundary hardening for incomplete exact-type inputs, cumulative denial-order tests, mutation-proof assertions, and stronger hosted non-claim regressions369da3a13cac2016300d4b8f08e2306d0f1bac7f— final continuation-lineage reconciliationThe pure
src.hosted_access_control.evaluate_workspace_access()contract now:This is local software evidence only. It does not implement or prove identity-provider authentication, deployed workspace isolation, hosted persistence, durable audit storage, retention/deletion execution, monitoring, health checks, backup, rollback, incident response, named operating capacity, external-user validation, market demand, or market readiness.
Verification at exact head
Local verification on the synchronized product tree:
dateutildeprecation warningExact-head GitHub Actions run
30191193745completed successfully at369da3a13cac2016300d4b8f08e2306d0f1bac7f:Exact slice hygiene
The implementation range from
a1379aa04d8ced420ceaab37eeb31235e53357b9through369da3a13cac2016300d4b8f08e2306d0f1bac7fcontains exactly seven intentional paths:ROADMAP.mddocs/PRIVATE_BETA_ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/internal/COMMERCIAL_RESEARCH_BETA_CONTINUATION_GOAL_PROMPT.mddocs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-26-provider-neutral-workspace-authorization.mdsrc/hosted_access_control.pytests/test_hosted_access_control.pytests/test_public_v1_release_docs.pyGenerated CSV/JSON/report/sample-report/screenshot/timing paths in this range: 0.
Exactly 18 pre-existing local generated CSV/report differences remain excluded. Their unchanged diff fingerprint is:
a2c2f428b489dbb291dd54fd8a6e1e7f4ad9481414320ca248c54be89f4062b9No readiness rebuild, provider fetch, broad refresh, generated report, screenshot capture, timing generation, merge, or deployment was performed.
Quant and investing boundary
The calculation and fail-closed layers support indicators, DCF/scenarios, benchmark-relative metrics, drawdown/volatility/beta/Sharpe/Sortino, deterministic nowcast modeling, walk-forward testing, and point-in-time universe validation. Real quantitative investing capability is not enabled:
Remaining maturity gates
Next safe lane
Keep the current authorization policy isolated. The next executable provider-neutral lane is a separately reviewed design for retention/deletion or append-only audit-event interfaces. Do not select a provider or create/change hosted accounts, use credentials, deploy, publish, merge, or claim hosted capability without explicit approval.