[yiguodev]

Summary

Windows Core launches select process DNS behavior by tunnel backend, alongside the desktop and DNS updates for 26.11.3.

26.11.3+1
├─ UWP/MSIX: -set-dns=true
├─ Wintun/EXE: -set-dns=false
├─ App-generated DNS: TCP defaults and forwarding
├─ Desktop windows: window_manager 0.6 / nativeapi
└─ Xray settings: refresh latency summary after returning

Linux Core arguments keep their existing form. New advanced templates proxy non-address DNS queries, with loopback outbound validation. The branch also refreshes desktop dependencies and concise commit guidance.

Evidence

• Before: Both Windows backends used the same Core launch arguments and inherited its resolver override.
  After: Tests assert the complete UWP and Wintun commands with explicit -set-dns=true and -set-dns=false.
• flutter test --no-pub --reporter expanded test/core/ffi/base_ffi_api_test.dart test/core/ffi/windows_exe_test.dart test/core/ffi/windows_msix_test.dart: 44 passed using process/native substitutes.
• Static analysis of the six changed Core implementation/test files: no issues.
• git diff --check: passed. The tested Core files remained identical after incorporating the latest remote branch commit.
• Native desktop-window and VPN acceptance for the full branch was not rerun. The existing UWP VPN process identities remained unchanged during automated checks.

Merge Danger

Door: two-way

Blast Radius: Runtime

Windows packages must include a desktop Core supporting -set-dns=true|false. This branch also changes desktop window integration and App-generated DNS behavior.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T03:56:57.832765Z	1fe0eb2	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T03:58:38.077922Z	1fe0eb2	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[jkttim]

#267 (comment)