chore: fix some minor issues in comments

[xihuwenhua]

fix some minor issues in comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Fixed spelling errors in documentation text

• Chores

  • Corrected typo in startup script message

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[xihuwenhua]

Thanks for your review!

Anything need I to do?

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

These changes correct two typographical errors: "sucessful" to "successful" in README.md and "Initalizing" to "Initializing" in mainnet/start-node.sh. No functional or behavioral modifications are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Typographical corrections README.md, mainnet/start-node.sh	Fixed spelling: "sucessful" → "successful" in documentation; "Initalizing" → "Initializing" in shell script echo message.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Stray letters scattered left and right,
"Sucessful" didn't look quite right,
A typo here, a typo there,
I hopped and fixed them with great care!
Now clean and crisp, the code does gleam,
Spelling perfection is my dream! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR title describes fixing minor issues in comments, but the actual changes include typo fixes in a README bullet point and a shell script echo message—neither explicitly comments.	Clarify whether these are comment fixes (in which case the title is misleading) or general textual fixes (in which case consider a more precise title like 'chore: fix typos in README and shell script').

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f4f1b0 and e1467f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md (1 hunks)
• mainnet/start-node.sh (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

mainnet/start-node.sh (1)

5-5: Typo corrected.

The spelling correction from "Initalizing" to "Initializing" improves the user-facing output quality without affecting functionality.

README.md (1)

55-55: Typo corrected.

The spelling correction from "sucessful" to "successful" improves the documentation quality without affecting any procedural steps or content meaning.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[xihuwenhua]

@gzliudan Hi,Thank you for your approval.

I have resolved the conflicts and rebased with the latest code. Please review it again.