P0: prove actual agent-to-tool bindings#268
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Addressed the binding trust-boundary review in commit
Validation: exact CI aggregate command passed ( |
pengfei-threemoonslab
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 12, 2026 05:16
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
This implements the P0 binding milestone: Agents Shipgate no longer assumes that every extracted tool declaration belongs to the configured agent.
AgentBindingGraphAssessmentrooted at the configured agent.tool_catalogfrom proven-reachabletool_inventorycapabilities.agent_bindingsdeclarations with exact canonical selectors.insufficient_evidenceoutside the suppressible Finding model.Framework normalization covers OpenAI Agents SDK, LangChain/LangGraph, CrewAI, Google ADK, n8n, and exact Codex plugin MCP inventories. MCP, OpenAPI, OpenAI tool JSON, and Anthropic artifacts remain catalogs unless structural wiring or a reviewed declaration binds them. Conductor remains non-pass-eligible until it emits the same normalized graph contract.
Why
The previous pipeline conflated extraction with reachability: every catalog declaration was assigned to one synthetic agent. That could both attribute unrelated provider tools to an agent and evaluate controls against capabilities the agent could not actually call. Conversely, it could not defend a
passedresult with evidence of the deployed agent's complete reachable tool and handoff graph.This change makes binding a first-class static evidence dimension. A pass now requires an unambiguous root, a complete reachable graph, and pass-eligible identity, binding, effect, and authority evidence for every reachable capability. Static analysis still does not prove runtime behavior.
Public contract and migration
0.16.0b2130.310.100.40.5/0.60.3Pre-0.31 binding data and mixed lock versions fail closed with regeneration guidance. There is no legacy catalog-as-agent runtime switch; users requiring that behavior must pin
0.16.0b1.Validation
-n autoplus coverage instrumentation.git diff --checkpassed.twine check.The large multi-framework sample now exposes 63 catalog tools and only five structurally bound SDK tools as reachable.
Review boundary
Shipgate preflight correctly routes this PR to a human because it changes protected schemas, policy semantics, CI, plugin/skill contracts, sample manifests, and reviewed binding declarations. No agent self-approval, suppression, baseline expansion, or policy weakening was used.
The four-week / three-design-partner rollout remains an external promotion requirement. This PR does not claim that rollout evidence is code-enforced or that the independent 100-case beta corpus has already been collected.