-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
feat: Implemented search annotations for runs #68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
yuechao-qin
wants to merge
4
commits into
TangleML:master
Choose a base branch
from
yuechao-qin:ycq/feat-run-list-filter-annotations
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,266
−53
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bef4c47
Implemented search annotations for runs
yuechao-qin 2e69b8f
Remove key from ValueFilter
yuechao-qin 87e12b2
Run black formatter and added configuration to the pyproject.toml
yuechao-qin ac77dde
Fixed the group logic so that only 1 SQL EXISTS appear per group query
yuechao-qin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a piece of feedback on REST semantics mainly. Typically you wouldn't see a
POSTrequest for searching for resources, in other words getting resources. If it were a GraphQL API then things would be different.Here's the suggestion:
Turn this into a GET endpoint:
This is clear that you get retrieving a list of pipeline runs, which would be an unfiltered, paginated response by default. Then add the search capability after the foundation (unfiltered search) is established.
From loading the UI, I can see there is already a request being made:
and upon asking cursor, I know that it has a pagination implementation already. We can add the filter options to this existing endpoint rather than creating a new endpoint. Which would set a good precedence for all future search capabilities on other resources.
Here is an example of how I've seen this implemented:
With other operators like gte (greater than or equal), lte, etc.
Accounting for complex AND / OR combinations is something that would require some thought but I wouldn't go there unless that's something we see people using. The above example is a basic OR and AND.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main reason for using POST is that GET requests do not support body. Sending complex query structures via query parameters can be problematic in certain cases. If we can overcome that, then we can use GET piepline_runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will dig up some documentation on how I've seen this achieved previously then we can review if it meets our needs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are some helpful resources:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think if we solve this once, we can use the same solution for all future APIs and won't need an extra
/searchendpoint to maintain