Skip to content

docs: add an opt-in Parallel Search MCP example - #40

Open
georgeatparallel wants to merge 1 commit into
Swival:masterfrom
georgeatparallel:parallel-search-e9b78d81-3e8e-40f7-833f-3d34e2208475
Open

georgeatparallel wants to merge 1 commit into
Swival:masterfrom
georgeatparallel:parallel-search-e9b78d81-3e8e-40f7-833f-3d34e2208475

Conversation

@georgeatparallel

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds an opt-in setup for web search and page extraction through Swival's existing HTTP MCP support. Users add a small table to swival.toml; Parallel's anonymous free tier needs no API key or local server and has rate limits. The example identifies Swival with a User-Agent header and includes a search-then-fetch prompt. Model selection and existing MCP configuration keep their current behavior.

The docs source and generated HTML page are included. Validation passed 373 MCP/config tests, Ruff lint and formatting checks, and the website build with its local link checks. The installed CLI loaded the documented table, discovered both tools, executed live anonymous search and fetch, and printed a sourced TaskGroup summary. Inference was supplied by a deterministic local fixture, so this checks Swival's tool round trip rather than any model's search decisions.

For context, Parallel Fast records 80.2 average answer-item F1 on a 0-to-100 scale in DeepSearchQA, with 18.8 seconds per task in Artificial Analysis's benchmark harness. That's useful context for a lightweight search option, not a Swival speed measurement or a comparison with its browser tools.

Btw - I'm a devrel engineer at Parallel

@jedisct1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi George,

Parallel Search looks like a great and genuinely useful product!

Would it be possible to mention Swival in Parallel's documentation alongside Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor?

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants