Skip to content

chore(deps): lock file maintenance - #393

Merged
SamuelIVX merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

SamuelIVX merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@SamuelIVX

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/New_York)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

@SamuelIVX
SamuelIVX enabled auto-merge (squash) October 20, 2026 13:05
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

⛔ Ignored keywords: 4
  • chore(deps)
  • fix(deps)
  • chore(deps-dev)
  • fix(deps-dev)

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 52622585-ebeb-4a10-85dc-a813ea79e80d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Deprecation Warning: The deny-licenses option is deprecated for possible removal in the next major release. For more information, see issue 997.

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scorecard details
PackageVersionScoreDetails
npm/@inquirer/checkbox 5.2.7 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/confirm 6.3.4 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/core 12.0.5 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/editor 5.3.5 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/expand 5.1.7 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/input 5.1.8 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/number 4.2.5 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/password 5.2.4 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/prompts 8.7.4 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/rawlist 5.3.7 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/search 4.3.5 UnknownUnknown
npm/@inquirer/select 5.2.7 UnknownUnknown
npm/@tanstack/query-core 5.104.5 UnknownUnknown
npm/@tanstack/react-query 5.104.5 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/parser 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/project-service 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/scope-manager 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/type-utils 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/types 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/utils 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys 8.72.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/baseline-browser-mapping 2.11.30 UnknownUnknown
npm/caniuse-lite 1.0.30001817 🟢 4.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 0Found 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Maintained🟢 810 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
npm/electron-to-chromium 1.5.461 🟢 4.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Code-Review⚠️ 0Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
SAST⚠️ 0no SAST tool detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 4dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
npm/fast-uri 3.1.9 🟢 8.1
Details
CheckScoreReason
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Code-Review🟢 3Found 10/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 5dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
License🟢 9license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
SAST🟢 8SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
CI-Tests🟢 1011 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Contributors🟢 10project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
npm/ignore 7.0.13 🟢 4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Code-Review⚠️ 2Found 6/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
License🟢 9license file detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
npm/lucide-react 1.60.0 🟢 6.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Code-Review🟢 8Found 16/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
License🟢 9license file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 9dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Branch-Protection🟢 3branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
SAST🟢 4SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
npm/typescript-eslint 8.72.0 🟢 6.8
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 8Found 17/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 8dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
SAST🟢 3SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3

Scanned Files

  • package-lock.json

@SamuelIVX
SamuelIVX merged commit 0630312 into main Oct 20, 2026
16 checks passed
@SamuelIVX
SamuelIVX deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch October 20, 2026 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant