Skip to content

[autobackport: sssd-2-9] Tests: fix the tests to check the new pattern#8720

Open
sssd-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
SSSD:sssd-2-9from
sssd-bot:SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8719-to-sssd-2-9
Open

[autobackport: sssd-2-9] Tests: fix the tests to check the new pattern#8720
sssd-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
SSSD:sssd-2-9from
sssd-bot:SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8719-to-sssd-2-9

Conversation

@sssd-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is an automatic backport of PR#8719 Tests: fix the tests to check the new pattern to branch sssd-2-9, created by @aborah-sudo.

Please make sure this backport is correct.

Note

The commits were cherry-picked without conflicts.

You can push changes to this pull request

git remote add sssd-bot git@github.com:sssd-bot/sssd.git
git fetch sssd-bot refs/heads/SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8719-to-sssd-2-9
git checkout SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8719-to-sssd-2-9
git push sssd-bot SSSD-sssd-backport-pr8719-to-sssd-2-9 --force

Original commits
04d5937 - Tests: fix the tests to check the new pattern

Backported commits

  • 949a91f - Tests: fix the tests to check the new pattern

Original Pull Request Body

I got confirmation that this is simply a log change issue. We can fix the tests to check the new pattern.
#8540

I got confirmation that this is simply a log change issue.   We can fix the tests to check the new pattern.
SSSD#8540

Reviewed-by: Scott Poore <spoore@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 04d5937)
@sssd-bot sssd-bot requested a review from spoore1 May 21, 2026 20:15
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the log message pattern in the test_refresh_contain_timestamp test within src/tests/multihost/alltests/test_kcm.py. The grep command and the corresponding failure message were updated to search for 'ldap_search_ext called:' instead of 'calling ldap_search_ext with'. I have no feedback to provide as there were no review comments to evaluate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants