Repository navigation
[Docs] Clarify Slack destination discovery and current-conversation replies - #3669
Draft
roomote-community[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
roomote-community[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
roomote-community[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
No code issues found. See session Reviewed both documentation pages against public-only Slack destination discovery and current-conversation/automation reply handling. CI docs validation, tests, lint, type checks, and Knip passed; Docker and JavaScript/TypeScript CodeQL checks were still running at review time. Reviewed 1b56165 |
Merged
8 of 11 tasks
This was referenced Nov 6, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related issue
Daily docs accuracy audit for 2026-11-04T03:00:36.618Z through 2026-11-05T03:00:36.618Z; no linked issue.
Why this PR exists
What changed
Clarify in the session and Slack guides that standalone Slack destination lookup lists public channels the app has joined, excludes private channels, and is separate from replying in the current conversation or an automation's configured report channel. An absent private channel is not evidence that Slack access was lost.
The window's Slack explanation fix (#3646,
37aa060) exposes the distinction already enforced bydiscoverSlackChannelson shipped main/v1.20.0 (d2390b12). The docs previously implied broader discovery. This is a docs-only correction, with no runtime or permissions change.Checked six develop merges plus the main promotion in the exact window. The default branch is develop (
57aa1a2e); the published release is v1.20.0/main (d2390b12, released 2026-11-04T15:14:47Z). The Slack and Copilot helper fixes are develop-only. MCP client management/revocation (#3657) already includes its settings, upgrade, Redis, and rollback guidance. The promotion also first ships connection testing (#3655) and task safety stops (#3658), already covered in their feature docs. Dependency patches #3625/#3649 require no new setup instructions.Open docs PRs were checked for overlap, including the actual Slack diff in #3647 and provider fixes in #3594; neither covers this discovery distinction. Pending unrelated corrections remain separate.
How it was tested
mise exec -- pnpm --filter @roomote/docs check-cookbook-indexpassed: seven recipes current.mise exec -- pnpm --filter @roomote/docs checkpassed: pinned Mintlify build validation and no broken links.git diff --checkpassed. Normal pre-push checks passed: oxlint, web/worker residual ESLint, all 27 fast typecheck tasks, and Knip.pnpm lint/pnpm check-types, and live external Slack/OAuth journeys were not run for this docs-only change.Checklist
[Fix],[Feat],[Improve],[Refactor],[Docs], or[Chore]followed by a user-facing descriptionpnpm lintandpnpm check-typespass locallypnpm changeset