Skip to content

feat: (phase 3) outlook server-to-server integration - #42107

Draft
nazabucciarelli wants to merge 3 commits into
feat/outlook-server-to-server-integration-phase2from
feat/outlook-server-to-server-integration-phase-3
Draft

feat: (phase 3) outlook server-to-server integration#42107
nazabucciarelli wants to merge 3 commits into
feat/outlook-server-to-server-integration-phase2from
feat/outlook-server-to-server-integration-phase-3

Conversation

@nazabucciarelli

@nazabucciarelli nazabucciarelli commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

Review in cubic

@nazabucciarelli
nazabucciarelli added this pull request to stack #42106 September 11, 2026 17:26
@dionisio-bot

dionisio-bot Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

  • This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label
  • This PR is missing the required milestone or project

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 590ca5f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 69.50%. Comparing base (80ab625) to head (590ca5f).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                                Coverage Diff                                @@
##           feat/outlook-server-to-server-integration-phase2   #42107   +/-   ##
=================================================================================
  Coverage                                             69.50%   69.50%           
=================================================================================
  Files                                                  4329     4329           
  Lines                                                180082   180082           
  Branches                                              31544    31585   +41     
=================================================================================
+ Hits                                                 125162   125173   +11     
+ Misses                                                49817    49810    -7     
+ Partials                                               5103     5099    -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 70.73% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

…thub.com:RocketChat/Rocket.Chat into feat/outlook-server-to-server-integration-phase-3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant