Skip to content

fix(approval): recognize versioned Codex review receipts - #149

Merged
Nickfost merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
t3/versioned-review-receipts
Oct 24, 2026
Merged

Nickfost merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
t3/versioned-review-receipts

Conversation

@Nickfost

@Nickfost Nickfost commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Configuration approval rejects the provider's exact v1 receipt header, several verified current opening variants, and completed summaries triggered by marking a draft ready. A genuine clean review can therefore fail approval despite an unchanged head and trusted reviewer identity.

Recognize the exact optional <!-- codex-review-receipt:v1 --> header, the Draft marked ready trigger and the finite documented set of verified opening variants. Preserve legacy receipt formats, both capture groups, footer grammar, exact commit resolution and numeric reviewer identity. Unknown versions, arbitrary prose, warnings, null finding flags, stale or edited receipts, later conflicting requests, deletions and unresolved review threads remain rejected. A dashboard alone still cannot approve a configuration.

Validation: all 48 approval regressions passed without skips. The six additional unedited provider bodies were checked against their independently captured hashes. Python syntax, documentation links, whitespace, commit format and committed-tree credential scanning passed. Initial exact-source review passed for the earlier implementation; a new independent final-head review and full hosted validation remain required for this final set.

Documentation: docs/CONFIGURATION-APPROVAL.md lists the exact supported grammar and retained rejection behavior. Standalone-template code/schema need no change; matching operator guidance is tracked in RandomDevelopment/ci-fleet-config-template#42. Runtime selection, images, private configuration and host activation remain separate.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-24T20:29:44.164319Z 846c2a4 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Nickfost
Nickfost marked this pull request as draft October 24, 2026 20:14
@Nickfost
Nickfost marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2026 20:14
@Nickfost

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Chef's kiss.

Reviewed commit: 846c2a4829

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Nickfost
Nickfost merged commit 4467042 into main Oct 24, 2026
2 checks passed
@Nickfost
Nickfost deleted the t3/versioned-review-receipts branch October 24, 2026 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant