PR Bot phase 5 testing - #6969
Open
samathew121 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
✅ All Checks Passed — Ready for Review
📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures. |
|
🎉 All checks passed! This PR is ready for review. |
|
✅ Author chose to skip pr bot run hence removing label ( |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
TheRock-pr-bot tool to add policy based checks on PRs.
right now we are adding label "not ready for review" for PRs that does
not have issue/jira linked and PRs that has zero unit test to it. We
have other checks at place around forbidden files, pre-commit failure,
branch name convention. and more checks marked as soon to enabled.
Technical Details
The checks are purely based on config file named policy.yml based PR
BOT. this is not a llm/AI based bot. This is using code to
deterministically provide checks.
Updation in current PR?
Test Plan
This PR initially raised on TheRock post that it will extend to rocm-systems and rocm-libraries.
ISSUE ID
#6727
@skip-pr-bot