Repository navigation
ci(governance): adopt the shared PR governance action - #106
Conversation
Replace the inline gate with the pinned v2 composite action, move the repo policy into .github/governance/policy.json, and relay fork review events through the permissionless signal workflow. Status check contexts are unchanged: risk-gate, ai-review, pr-template, clearing-label.
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: aa4a6adead
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
The repository content rules forbid account identifiers in public source, so the policy no longer carries them and the gate reads RISK_GATE_REVIEWER_APP_ID, RISK_GATE_REVIEWER_USER_ID and RISK_GATE_REVIEWER_LOGIN. The action is pinned to v3, which resolves and validates that configuration before trusting a receipt.
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
Pigbibi
added
the
agent-approved
AI assistance
Qoder agent (Claude) performed the migration and the checks below.
What changed
Replace the inline gate with the organization's shared
QuantStrategyLab/.github/pr-governanceaction, pinned to91252f55364c2e1f555cc42111a1897b47ce52fd(tagv3):.github/workflows/risk-gate.ymlis now the rendered shared template; it reads the reviewer identity fromRISK_GATE_REVIEWER_APP_ID,RISK_GATE_REVIEWER_USER_IDandRISK_GATE_REVIEWER_LOGIN..github/governance/policy.jsonholds the repo policy without account identifiers, per the content-boundary rule inAGENTS.md..github/workflows/pr-review-signal.ymlrelays fork review events to the trusted run.The gate still validates app id, user id and login before trusting a receipt; a partial configuration fails closed.
How verified
.github/**path, manifests, and credential/runtime/strategy paths are R2; prose indocs/andREADMEis R0.