[Pigbibi]

AI assistance

OpenAI Codex

What changed

• Show platforms without an approved source binding in the scheduled account report and describe the management console's role.
• Separate submitted orders, fill reports and distinct orders with fills. Show an observed minimum when the complete execution inventory is unavailable.
• Preserve reported legacy equity with its missing snapshot time identified. Display explicit persistence and delivery failures beside execution issues.

How verified

• Full Python suite, with 1,178 tests run and 12 skipped. Focused Cloud Run and bilingual golden tests also passed after the final wording adjustment.
• Repository documentation check, focused Ruff error checks and staged Gitleaks scan.

Why

The November account report omitted unbound platforms, did not distinguish fill reports from orders with fills, and concealed explicit evidence failures.

Refs QuantStrategyLab/.github#36 and QuantStrategyLab/.github#40.

Risk

R2 for the protected daily digest paths. The scope is account report presentation and its regression tests. Upstream account facts remain limited to available evidence.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-10T21:36:25.752047Z	ea644eb	Manual request
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-10T21:39:04.111447Z	ea644eb	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[Pigbibi]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please!

Reviewed commit: ea644ebcd5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ea644ebcd5

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.