[Pigbibi]

AI assistance

Codex (GPT-6; host-selected model).

What changed

Pin both PR governance action uses in .github/workflows/risk-gate.yml from 873eb5afc59a56a394dabe8261e0e2ab5b8f769f to fc9ec65785670e0e6db3d8a60b807c0798ca7329, the merged QuantStrategyLab/.github #53 evaluator fix. This is a single-file, two-line consumer pin update; no workflow logic or permissions change.

How verified

• SG egress guard PASS.
• Verified shared Rename plugin auto option to enabled #53 MERGED at the exact new SHA and its action manifest exists.
• QRS fix(console): Show inbox blockers and decision outcomes in the decision inbox #1086 remains Ready at ebd305d8a0e390b99cccd18c3459d8dabb6818b7, base 884b780364a8e04bc647575be4646e6c2c702ce7.
• Exact single-file/two-pin replacement and YAML parse PASS; actionlint and git diff --check PASS.
• Generated display/config checks and runtime-target validation PASS.
• Python unittest: 1147 tests, 10 skipped, no failures.
• Documentation style: 0 blocking, 1 existing advisory.

Why

Owner t1493u authorized this bounded consumer update and a fresh main workflow_dispatch for #1086 after the pin lands. The previous run 42475445102 embeds the old action and must not be rerun. This PR does not merge or modify #1086.

Risk

R2 CI consumer pin. It adopts the already merged evaluator fix while preserving required checks and existing authorization rules. Runtime/deployment behavior is not verified by this change. No deploy or protected operation is authorized here.

Self-review

N/A (no code change): immutable action revision configuration only. Existing masking, fail-closed, concurrency and snapshot logic are unchanged in this consumer. No new tests or fabricated fail-before run were added for a literal pin change.

Central publication check

publication-check/2.0-advisory build 83d9d1130377 completed in advisory mode: total findings 4030; matching lines 4027. The full tracked candidate was scanned; these findings do not independently block publication under owner rule pt1114u. The diff introduces no identifier-bearing values. First 20 matches (masked):

• .github/CODEOWNERS:4: /.github/CODEOWNERS @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:5: /.github/workflows/ @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:6: /actions/publish-runtime-execution-evidence/ @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:7: /python/scripts/check_credential_maintenance_read.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:8: /python/scripts/credential_maintenance_notify.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:9: /python/scripts/deployment_bundle_contract.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:10: /python/scripts/deterministic_risk_gate.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:11: /python/scripts/execution_evidence_projection.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:12: /python/scripts/forward_observation_risk_control.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:13: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_composer.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:14: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_composer_v2.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:15: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_observation_ingress.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:16: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_observation_ingress_v2.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:17: /python/scripts/paper_risk_admission_receipt.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:18: /schemas/qsl-deployment-bundle.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:19: /schemas/qsl-forward-observation-risk-control.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:20: /schemas/qsl-reconcile-only-risk-control.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:21: /scripts/provision_binance_recovery_credentials.sh @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:22: /scripts/provision_soxl_v7_review_credential.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• .github/CODEOWNERS:23: /web/strategy-switch-console/application/console_api/strategy_execution.js @<PROJECT_ID>

[Pigbibi]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T13:35:03.800698Z	e08d39b	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T13:38:34.337839Z	e08d39b	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: e08d39b855

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e08d39b855

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.