[Pigbibi]

AI assistance

Codex (gpt-6.1-sol).

What changed

Keep the existing five-section operator display in the central daily caller,
coverage details and unified deadline fallback. Present the unbound Binance
inventory as disabled under the standing owner OFF decision, with runs/orders/
fills N/A. Missing inventory and other unbound sources remain unknown; a bound
Binance target retains its real coverage.

Pass an already supplied source-run URL only when it matches the platform's
configured repository and canonical HTTPS <PROJECT_ID> Actions run path. Reuse the
shared URL sanitizer to remove query/fragment; otherwise show an unavailable
marker. Do not construct URLs from run IDs. Preserve counts, incident state,
business windows, reservations and delivery receipts.

How verified

• Tests first: fail-before output records the disabled/link/fallback gaps.
• Final isolated Python suite: 1147 tests, PASS, 10 skipped. Candidate file
  comparison: all nine changed files byte-identical to the validated checkout.
• Seven new presentation tests, bilingual golden snapshots, URL rejection,
  not-run coverage and unknown whole-window scope; existing 13 projection
  tests verify diagnostics within the 1024-unit budget.
• Generated display/config checks, runtime-target validation, package build,
  documentation style and whitespace checks pass (one existing README advisory).
• The shared workspace initially exposed three compatibility-test failures
  because sibling repositories affect discovery. The same untouched checker
  passes in the isolated full-suite environment. One introduced budget overflow
  was fixed by shortening only the caller's English coverage sentence.

Why

Source-level five-section support did not establish central caller adoption.
The caller lost the known-disabled Binance distinction and did not supply
safe source-run navigation or its explicit unavailable status.

Risk

R1: presentation-only backend change. No new sender, schema or service. No
frontend workflow or frontend asset pin change. No deploy, production messages,
collection, backend activation, Environment approval, Secret/IAM, trading,
Kelly, stop-loss or session renewal. Missing deployed revision and natural
producer/delivery receipts remain NOT_PROVEN; source tests and merge cannot
prove runtime adoption. Prepared for one exact-head review request; no merge or labels.

Main synchronization verification

Merged main f9d8c99e7bfd0628aa68e2cb9b429632a2bc56d6 without conflicts using an ordinary merge. New head c383dd244e87fa5499ab7d60b801649e824fb567. All nine feature files are byte-identical to the prior reviewed candidate; the comparator delta from main is retained.

Fresh checks: seven presentation regressions PASS; isolated full Python suite 1147 tests PASS / 10 skipped; generated display/configuration and runtime validation PASS; package source/wheel build PASS; documentation and whitespace PASS; comparator and deploy-safety suites PASS. The first archive-only validation lacked Git metadata; the Git clone run passes without a source change. Python 3.13 locally; hosted Python 3.12 and required js remain separate checks.

Fresh exact-head review is requested for this integrated candidate; the prior review does not accept this head. Keep Draft for a separate merge job. No labels, undraft, merge, deploy, Secret/IAM or production actions from this job. Runtime adoption remains NOT_PROVEN.

Central publication scan

Checker: publication-check/2.0-advisory (build 83d9d1130377). Advisory mode.
Total matches: 4028 matching lines (4031 checker findings).
Complete synchronized tracked tree scanned. No new credential identified in the feature delta.
First 20 masked matches:

.github/CODEOWNERS:4 /.github/CODEOWNERS @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:5 /.github/workflows/ @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:6 /actions/publish-runtime-execution-evidence/ @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:7 /python/scripts/check_credential_maintenance_read.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:8 /python/scripts/credential_maintenance_notify.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:9 /python/scripts/deployment_bundle_contract.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:10 /python/scripts/deterministic_risk_gate.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:11 /python/scripts/execution_evidence_projection.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:12 /python/scripts/forward_observation_risk_control.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:13 /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_composer.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:14 /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_composer_v2.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:15 /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_observation_ingress.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:16 /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_observation_ingress_v2.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:17 /python/scripts/paper_risk_admission_receipt.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:18 /schemas/qsl-deployment-bundle.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:19 /schemas/qsl-forward-observation-risk-control.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:20 /schemas/qsl-reconcile-only-risk-control.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:21 /scripts/provision_binance_recovery_credentials.sh @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:22 /scripts/provision_soxl_v7_review_credential.py @<PROJECT_ID>
.github/CODEOWNERS:23 /web/strategy-switch-console/application/console_api/strategy_execution.js @<PROJECT_ID>

[Pigbibi]

@codex review

Please review the current Draft head 45569a2b4a8d for the bounded daily caller
presentation changes. This requests one review of this exact candidate only.
Runtime adoption remains NOT_PROVEN; no deployment or activation is requested.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-07T12:52:23.954727Z	c383dd2	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-07T12:54:14.022191Z	c383dd2	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: 45569a2b4a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[Pigbibi]

@codex review

Please review the new exact head c383dd244e87fa5499ab7d60b801649e824fb567 after the ordinary merge of current main into this Draft. The nine-file daily-caller feature is byte-identical to the prior reviewed candidate. Seven focused tests and the isolated full Python suite (1147 tests, 10 skipped), configuration checks, package build, documentation, comparator and deploy-safety checks pass. Review the integrated candidate; prior acceptance is not reused for this head. No merge, undraft, label, deployment or activation is requested.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: c383dd244e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".